|
Taking good photos of animals or insect life is a very
challenging but rewarding subject matter to tackle. An appreciation of the animals
to be photographed will go a long way in helping you coming away with the
photos you want. Studying the behaviour of the animals that is of
interest to you will reveal when it's a good time to take photos. Be
prepared for a lot of waiting around for the right photo opportunity
as sometimes the animal or the environment may conspire against you.

A good way to start is perhaps photographing your own pet (if you
have one or the neighbours). If any rules are to be applied here then the main rule
would be to get down to their level. Shooting from the animals eye
level (or there abouts) helps to give a more realistic rendition.
As mentioned earlier there
may be a lot of waiting around, but, this
time should not be wasted. Use the time to understand the typical
animal behaviour. It is often the case that it will take some time
to determine an animals behaviour but it is worth putting in the
effort as it will pay off in the end.
Wildlife photography is one of the areas of photography where having the right
equipment will make life a lot easier to achieve the desired
results. It is important to match the equipment you intend to use to
the kind of wildlife you intend to take photos of. Certainly a
pro-body DSLR is not essential but it does offer a highly responsive
body usually protected from the elements. Most
important for the DSLR user is the lens used. The choice of lens
will be dictated by the type of animal to be photographed. Some just cannot be
photographed at close range without disturbing them (and making yourself subject of their next meal). For animals in the wild
at some distance away
there may be no choice but to use the large, heavy, and expensive 600mm
telephoto lens to ensure reasonable magnification. A slightly
shorter lens with a tele-converter may also fit the bill. In this
case keep in mind that not only do you lose a stop or two of light
but image sharpness will also be degraded.
Should you not be taking photos in the wilds of some safari plain
then you may find that a 70-200mm, 70-300mm, 200mm or a 300mm lenses
may offer sufficient magnification. Tele-converters can be
employed as a more cost effective way to get greater magnification. Keep in mind that if
shooting with a DSLR using an APS-C based image sensor the effective
crop (compared to a full frame image sensor) gives the impression of
added magnification. For Nikon, Pentax and Sony DSLRs this is 1.5x,
for Canon it is 1.6x, for Sigma it is 1.7x, and for Olympus and
Panasonic it is 2x. So, a 200mm focal length will give the
impression of a 300mm lens with an imaging sensor cropping by 1.5.
Wildlife photography is not all about
using super telephoto lenses.
The shorter focal lengths are very much valid and are suitable for
animals you can get closer to. Prime lenses such as the 30mm,
35mm, 50mm, and 85mm are very capable but depending on the animal,
the flexibility of a zoom lens, such as a 16-85mm lens
(24-128mm on an APS-C DSLR and x1.5 crop) may be more advantageous.
Photographing insects and
various kinds of bugs is another challenge that may not suit some if
they don't like bugs. The macro lens is king here and there are
various versions to suit different requirements. Ideally, there
should be sufficient distance between the front of the lens and the
subject. This firstly reduces the possibility of the subject being
disturbed and secondly, it ensures sufficient light can call on the
subject. There is always the temptation to get as close to the
subject as possible for dramatic macro photos but with resulting
obscured light or the need to use some kind of additional lighting.
It is well worth keeping in mind what the typical lighting
conditions are likely to be when selecting which lens to use for a
shoot. Lenses like a 70-300mm f/4.5-5.6 are fine in good light but
it's relatively slow optical speed means in non optimal lighting
conditions (overcast, shaded, or just low light levels) the AF may performance may be hindered (the factor here will
be dependant on the AF capabilities of the DSLR body). The cameras
ISO sensitivity will need to be boosted to compensate for the poor
light. It is well
understood that boosting the ISO will impact on the quality of the
captured image (increased image noise, potential desaturation of
colours, and reduced contrast). Some of the high end DSLRs with full
frame imaging sensors are fully capable of achieving quality images
even at very high ISO but this is not the normal (at this time). For
most cameras it is better to limit the ISO and consider a faster
optic. With the super telephoto lenses there may be no option as
size and weight constraints limit the maximum optical speed. For the
less powerful optics there are usual high speed variants.
Fast optics have many benefits apart from the obvious fact that
they gather more light. Depth of field becomes more shallow and
allows for greater differentiation between the subject and the
background (as well as the foreground). A downside to consider here
is that the DOF many become too narrow if the subject is close and
the aperture would have to be stopped down to compensate. With faster optics the
image seen in the viewfinder is brighter which is a benefit under
more trying lighting conditions. This added brightness is also used
by the AF module which means autofocusing remains responsive and
accurate as light levels decline.
Perhaps the most popular high quality telephoto zoom lens is the
70-200mm f/2.8. Most of the camera systems will have a version of lens and
they are usually built to a high standard. Unfortunately to travel
with they are not so much fun as they are typically heavy due to the
large optics and the robust build. Not the lens to have when you
want to travel light but a lens to have when high image quality is the
priority.
Obtaining (or maintaining)
the correct exposure can be a difficulty when taking photos with
powerful telephone zoom lens. The high optical magnification
results in any camera shake being magnified also. Depending on the
situation, a monopod or tripod will be required and attached to the
lens if the lens is heavy and has a tripod collar. The use of the
tripod or monopod may not be practical in some situations and
perhaps not desirable if wanting to little the weight and the items
you travel with.
Many lenses now feature image stabilisation built-in and make it
more practical to shoot hand held in more challenging lighting
conditions or where the shutter speed is just below what you
require. The alternative method of stabilisation is within the
camera body. This works equally as well but has the added advantage
of providing image stabilisation to any lens attached. Both systems
typically provide between 3 to 4 stops.
| |
|
Autofocus /
Focus Technique |
This is one time when it is useful to employ the full capability
of the autofocus array of your camera. On many occasions using the
central AF sensor and locking focus then recomposing the the shot as
required. This works well if the subject is stationary for a certain
amount of time but is too slow if the subject is on the move. To
ensure you get the composition you want the non-central AF sensors
come into play. Depending on the camera used the AF sensor will
attempt to track the subject should it move by handing over to the
next available sensor. Continuous focus would be required to be set
to get full benefits and focusing accuracy.
It is recommended to focus on the animals eyes as this is usually
the most important aspect that you'll want to render sharp. The
focus point can be very critical especially when shooting with a
fast lens with a narrow depth of field or when using a telephoto
lens. Avoid just focusing on any part of the animal in the hope of
getting a good shot. If focusing on the right point is difficult due
to the subject moving then consider increasing the depth of field to
make up for some focus placement inaccuracies. However keep in mind
the impact this will have on the overall exposure and the
possibility that the ISO sensitivity may have to be boosted.
Exposure metering is carried out as per normal but special
attention should be paid to animals very light in colour (more so if
the ambient light is very bright). Subjects such as white tigers,
pelicans, and swans will challenge metering systems. Even the light
orangey colour of flamingos can cause metering issues. Evaluative
metering will try to achieve a decent exposure balance between the
subject and it's background but it will likely be to the detriment
of highlight detail. With animals such as indicated, the highlight
detail will likely cover an extended area which will effectively
burnout. Exposure compensation needs to be applied and the degree of
correction will depend on the light levels and how much of the frame
is taken up by the animal.
Attention should also be paid to brightly coloured animals in
direct sunlight. The colour may look impressive and striking but
they could potential cause exposure issues. The overall exposure may
initially seem fine but closer examination will likely show that the
colours have become clipped. This may not be apparent from the
standard luminance histogram but if your camera can show RGB
histogram the clipped colours will be apparent. Exposure
compensation will need to be employed to protect again this and the
use of an image processing application used to restore the image but
with better controlled colours. This all implies that the photos are
captured as RAW files as this format provides the highest level of
flexibility.
Where you take your photos from will be dependant on the
environment in which you find yourself and the type of animal you
wan to photograph. Animals that don't see you as hostile or prey
make the task of photographing them a little easier but that does
not mean they will necessarily wait around to smile at your camera.
Primates tend to an interesting challenge. It is not unknown for
these animals to turn their backs towards you as if they don't want
you to see what they are doing. It can be a long wait for them to
turn round again if you find the places you can take a photo from is
limited. At other times the opposite may happen and they spend time
observing 'the strange humans'. These make for interesting
challenges and so be prepared to go home empty handed or at least
with not the shots you had in mind.
Some animals may initially
run for cover when first sighting a human but if you stick around
long enough they may return and go about their business almost as
though your weren't there. In reality they are keeping a keen eye on
their surroundings and will vanish again at a moments notice.
With all the potential waiting around and
carrying heavy gear it pays to have a decent camera bag that will
protect your equipment from the elements (EA: I've been caught in
sudden heavy showers before on a few occasions) and to not wear you
down over an extended period of time.
Perhaps the ultimate way to travel light is to
shoot with one of the modern super zoom compacts which provide an
image stabilised lens with typical focal lengths from 28-400mm. A
lot can be achieved with this kind of camera in decent light and
with the subject relatively motionless. Keep in mind that such cameras tend
to have very wide depth of field which may make it a bit harder to
differentiate the animal from its surroundings unless the subject is
fairly close. This makes it more
essential that the photographer takes extra care to avoid
backgrounds that may detract from the main subject.
Wildlife photography will challenge any
photographer whether they are shooting with a compact or a top of
the line DSLR. It is down to the photographer to understand the
capabilities and deficiencies of their camera and make it work to
their advantage. EA

























|