|
Sony Alpha 700 Review
The Sony Alpha 700 is in many ways a landmark camera for Sony.
It unlike the Alpha 100 which was clearly based on the Konica
Minolta Dynax 5D which came before it, the Alpha 700 was a completely
new design.


Specification
-
12.2MP sensor (Exmor
Technology).
-
Image rendering and data
handling by the High Speed Bionz processor.
-
40 segment evaluative
meter.
-
11 point AF sensor array
with dual cross-type central sensor for added precision.
-
Inbuilt image
stabilisation
(Steady Shot Inside).
-
3" High resolution LCD
monitor.
-
Shutter speed from 30
sec to 1/8000 sec.
-
Flash sync 1/250 (with
image stabilisation disabled).
-
D-Range Optimiser
Exposure
The exposure meter is a
development on that provided in the a100. It is essentially the same
40 segment honeycomb (evaluative) meter but retuned for improved exposures.
In use the meter came across as being neutral in the way that it
assessed light. This meant that it did not show a particular bias
towards over or under exposure. This is very good news as it allows
the user to better determine the required exposure. The evaluative
honeycomb meter worked well in many situations but where it could
not cope there is always the centre weighted and spot metering
options.
Note: The a700 underlying
heritage
stems from the technology used to define the Minotla cameras in the
film era. Back then the metering system was based on only 14
segments rather than the 40 segments now employed (note that the
Konica Minolta 7D and 5D DSLRs maintained the 14 segment configuration).
It is worth noting that Minolta maintained the 14 segment exposure
meter from the Dynax 7xi to almost all its range of cameras. In the digital era, it seems the
Alpha line will follow this same philosophy. The A100, A700, A350, A300 and
the A900 all use the same 40 segment evaluative meter but with
various tweaks. The good point with this is that if you are
switching cameras it makes it easier to interpret how the meter is
likely to react. One less worry to divert your concentration.
Comparing the A100, A350 and A700 shows the A100 to be the odd one
out as the A350 and A700 are improvements on the former.
The benefits moving from 14
to 40 segments may not be clear initially but are likely to be of
help with the Dynamic
The artificial intelligence
employed in the Dynax (Maxxum) film SLRs for determining the type of
subject the camera is pointed at seem to have been toned. With the
cameras set to program mode the it will try to set what it sees as
the best aperture and shutter speed combination based on what is
detected by the AF array and the metering pattern. It seems to work
better than the standard program mode found it many cameras but
could do with some improvements.
The front and rear control dials allow easy
and quick adjustment of shutter speeds and aperture. More
importantly these controls can be customised to the users
preference. For example, the operation of the control dials can be reversed
or one of the dials can be assigned to adjust exposure compensation
for fast exposure corrections.
Autofocus
The autofocusing sensor array
for the a700 follows what is almost becoming a typical 11 sensor
configuration (take a look at the cameras from Pentax, Nikon, and
Olympus). Autofocusing is very fast (though this is lens dependant)
and proved very consistent. Best performance is achieved with the
dual cross type central AF sensor. It affords greater accuracy and
consistency than the other sensors in the array even with optically
fast optics. It is worth noting that the sensor designed to work
with f/2.8 lens or faster is not cross type.

The best autofocusing
performance is achieved with Sony's SSM (Super Sonic Motor) lenses
which have the focusing motor built into the lens. The a700 has a
focusing motor built into its body to focus the non-SSM lenses. For
the most responsive performance the SSM lenses are a must but the
choice of these lenses are currently limited.
The a700 employs the Eye
Start feature which uses sensors under the viewfinder and on the
hand grip to activate the autofocus when the users eye is near the
viewfinder.
Image Quality
The camera with its 12MP of
resolution renders captured images in a very realistic and pleasant
manner. The usual problem areas of clipped highlights are kept under
control. Colours appear accurate if not a little understated in
comparison to that produced by the Konica Minolta Dynax 7D. It would
of been nice to have a 7D emulation mode but no doubt Sony want to
establish the A700 in its own right rather than harking back to the
past. To get the best image quality out of the A700 it is well worth
investing in quality optics. Shooting with G series or Zeiss lenses
shows improvements, in sharpness, contrast and colour rendering. The
colours almost take on a life of their own with quality optics in a
manner than is not easy to replicate by making adjusts to an image
in an image editor.
The ISO sensitivity ranges
from 100 to 3200 with the ability to extend it further to 6400. It
is worth noting that the auto ISO starts from ISO 200 as ISO 100 is
not the natural base ISO of the sensor. Shooting at ISO 100 can
result in a slightly more compact dynamic range compared to normal
resulting in greater possibility of clipped highlights.
Firmware updates (the latest
of which is version 4) have helped to improve the general image of
the a700 and included a provision to totally defeat any noise
reducing being applied to RAW files.
Images can be saved in jpeg,
RAW and cRAW. Three compression levels are provided for the jpeg
format. The cRAW format is a compressed version of the RAW format
and is useful for situations when memory card space is at a premium.
The key things i look for in
image rendering is smooth gradations, controlled transitions in high
contrast areas, controlled noise levels and decent dynamic range.
Unlike DSLRs from a few years age the a700 renders images with less
blown highlights.
The D-Range Optimiser proved
effective for producing photos with more details in the shadows when
shooting high contrast scenes. I preferred using the Advanced DRO
setting rather than the Standard DRO. More effective control is
offered by manual adjusting the levels (five levels are offered) but
care had to be taken not to overdo the effect. As the D-Range
Optimiser only works when saving photos to the jpeg format but I
found it useful to have it employed which shooting raw + jpeg. I
found the effect DRO had on images is not straightforward to
replicated from raw files even when using the provided software.
Flexibility
For those use to the
standard DSLR design will quickly notice that the A700 lacks an LCD
display showing exposure, drive, white balance and various other
status indicators. This is all presented on the high resolution LCD
monitor on the back of the camera. The screen information can be
shown in full or simplified and will adjust with the orientation of
the camera. Navigation on the display is controlled via a press of
the Fn (function) button and movement of the mini joystick.
Adjustment of parameters is either via the joystick or using the
control dials.
Conclusion / Performance
For me the true test of a
camera is not how it performs in technical tests but how it performs
in the field and the resulting output. One thing that is
apparent when out shooting is that the camera will not keep you waiting. Shots are
transferred to the memory card with great speed as the A700 has been
designed with high speed cards in mind. The faster the card
used the better. Clearing the buffer after shooting at 5fps is
prompt and typically completed in 16 seconds (after 15 frames) with an Extreme III card and
in 7 seconds (after 28 frames) with an Extreme IV card (in both
cases shooting just RAW). The a700 can also use Memory Stick Duo
cards and I kept one of 4GB capacity in the camera. However, I must
confess I often forgot it was there. I could serve as a useful
backup to the compact flash card but unfortunately there is no
facility to automatically switch between cards when one becomes
full. Switching has to be done manually. It would of also been
useful to be able to set up the card usage so raw files are saved to
the CF card and jpegs to the MS Duo card simultaneously.

The joystick control makes
selection of the required AF sensor quick but for consistent
performance with fast lenses I found it best to stick with the
central AF sensor. It is a shame that more more of the sensors were
not designed as cross types. Whether this is an issue will depend on
your shooting style. There have been times when there is no time to
pan and focus and it would be good if the off centre AF sensors were
as reliable as the centre sensor.
The viewfinder was clear and
bright with relatively good magnification for an APS-C based DSLR.
Diopter eye sight correction ensured customisation to the users eye. Despite the quality of the viewfinder I'm never quite comfortable manually
focusing, this is not just pointed towards the a700 but APS-C in
general. However, there are alternative focusing screens available
for the a700 (needs to be service centre fitted) to aid manual
focusing. The focus confirmation indicator is still active during
manual focusing. With regards to autofocus, subjects snap into view
very quickly. Certainly with the Carl Zeiss 16-80mm f/3.5 - 4.5 zoom
lens this is the case. Some lenses are a little slower whilst others
are a bit more noisy. Sony's SSM based lens are generally both very
quiet and fast. I felt the camera is at its best when using these
lenses as the focusing seemed more sensitive and responsive.
Autofocusing performance was at its best when the central AF sensor
was used. Focusing with fast lenses was accurate. It is worth noting
that the central AF sensor area is actually larger than indicated
and occasionally led to mis-focus issues when attempting to focus on
small subjects. It was not a big issue but it is worth noting. Of
more concern was the performance of the other sensors in the
focusing array. With the central sensor performing so well I felt it
a shame the other sensors weren't up to the same standard. I found
the focusing performance not as consistent as I would like and not
what I would call mission critical. Having said that, this seemed to
mainly apply when shooting with fast longer lenses like the G series 70-200mm
f/2.8 SSM and under awkward lighting conditions. I have found
however, what with wide AF area selected with continuous focusing
for tracking fast moving subjects, the individual AF sensors seem to
work well together with smooth tracking from one sensor to the next.
Manually selecting a sensor is made straightforward and fast but
using the mini joystick like control.
The
a700 has a built in focus aid light (similar to those now usually
only found on flashguns) to support better AF consistency in low
light or in low contrast situations.
The Eye Start feature always
ensured that the camera had focused as soon as the camera is brought
up to the eye. The sensor on the hand grip helps to ensure that the
autofocus is not erroneously activated when the camera is carried.
At times it was necessary to deactivate the Eye Start but on the
whole I preferred to leave this feature on.
The two control dials made
exposure adjustments straightforward. The default configuration was
to have the front dial control the shutter speed and the rear dial
controlling the aperture. However, this configuration can be
reversed which is useful for someone use to using Nikon DSLRs. With
the rear dial assigned to exposure compensation there was the danger
that the compensation setting may be knocked whilst carrying or
transporting the camera. Usefully, once there is no contact with the
hand grip with the dials are locked to prevent accidental
adjustments.
Pressing the AE button will
hold the current expose but it will also activate a comparison
between the active metering method and the spot meter. This gives
some assurance to the correct exposure if you are comfortable with
spot metering. This was a very useful feature on the film Dynax (Maxxum)
SLRs but in the digital age it could be argued that the histogram
now serves this purpose. Having said that, understanding the
metering will reduce the time spent having to check histograms and
potentially missing photo opportunities. I'm very impressed with the
a700's metering. It's not perfect but it made easy for me to
determine when it was likely to be in difficulty and how best to
compensate accordingly.

The built in flash came in
useful for providing fill-in flash to remove dark shadows when
taking photos of someone in the midday sun. Care has to be taken
when using the built-in flash to ensure that the attached lens does
not obscure flash light. I found whilst shooting with the Carl Zeiss
16-80mm lens or the Sony 11-18mm lens it was essential to remove the
lens hood. The a700 will work with some of the older Minolta
flashguns like the 5600 but the newer HVL-F42AM and especially
HVL-F58AM will make the most of the wireless flash capabilities.
I found image noise to be
well under control up to ISO 1600 but images were still usable at
ISO 3200. Raising the ISO to the maximum 6400 should only be done
for emergency purposes only. In practical terms, unless it is
necessary to freeze (or reduce motion), the built in image
stabilisation helps to ensure that ISO levels can be minimised.

The top plate has buttons
giving direct access to White Balance, ISO, Drive and Exposure
compensation but it looks a little odd not having an LCD display.
The same controls can be accessed via the LCD monitor and quick
navigational feature. This all makes the camera highly flexible and
fast in use when in the field.
One of the biggest decisions
to make when shooting with the camera is whether to shoot with the
standard RAW or cRAW. Why, because cRAW although compressed seems to
renders images which look indistinguishable from the larger RAW format.
There is always the thought that under certain circumstances the
differences will become clear. Generally, if storage space is not an
issue then use RAW or if you want to be sure you are capturing the
very best image. Beware, it is well worth being equipt with at least
8GB capacity cards if RAW files are the predominant format to be
used.
An upshot of increasing the
pixel count is that camera shake becomes more evident. Increasing
the pixel density effectively acts as a magnifier when viewing an image
at 100% on a screen. The image is larger than that produced on a
lower megapixel camera and hence imaging defects such as focus
inaccuracies and camera shake are more apparent. Displaying an image
at the same size despite changing the pixel density introduces no
further problems (in this context). The necessity for image
stabilisation becomes more apparent especially as the old rule of
setting the shutter speed to the reciprocal of the focal length
breaks down.
In keeping with Sony's
philosophy to allow a certain level of integration with other
devices, the camera is provided with a HDMI output for easy
connection to a HD TV and provided a remote control (that doubles as
an infrared remote shutter release) so you can enjoy the photos you
have taken from the comfort of your favourite chair.

The a700 uses a battery
which I found had enough capacity for between 400 and a little over
600 shots with plenty of use of the main LCD monitor. The battery
level was accurately represented as a percentage (as well as a
battery icon) to keep the user informed. Even when the battery level
gets down to zero there was sufficient charge remaining to keep
shooting for several more frames before the camera shut down. It is
worth noting here that the a700 seemed to make sure any shots being
transferred to the memory card were completed before the camera shut
down. I did not experience any corrupted photos or cards. For many I
suspect that one battery will be enough to last through the day.
The built in image
stabilisation for my style of photography
is a god send. It has reduce the need for me to use a tripod and the
fact that any lens that is attached to the camera is image
stabilised increases the range of lighting conditions I can shoot
in. The image stabilisation seems to allow shooting down to about
three stops slower than normal. This figure I found dependant on the
lens used, the focal length set, as well as how well the camera is
held. I tended to just leave the feature active and only deactivated
it when using a tripod.
The lack of a top plate LCD
display was not missed. Those coming from a camera that has it may
feel a bit disconcerted but this will most likely be resolved once
the camera is used. The large high resolution LCD monitor is a
wealth of information and is the prime way (together with the quick
navigation feature) of quickly adjusting settings. Because of the
high resolution screen images were portrayed in great detail which
had the added benefit of not needing to heavily magnify them in
order to check focus.
When shooting with heavier
lenses like to 70-200mm f/2.8 G series lens, I preferred to use
attached the optional vertical grip to a700. As well as providing
extra battery capacity because it can hold two batteries (the status
of both are shown on the LCD monitor) it helps to provide better
balance with the heavy lenses making handling better. The controls
on the grip are arranged in a similar configuration to that on the
camera body so when shooting vertically the controls are easy to
adjust. There was very little need for specifically learn the layout
of the controls. The control came in very handy but it is not an
essential item to have. I certainly would of preferred that the grip
was designed to be attached without the need to remove the battery
with the camera (as designed on the Minolta Dynax 7 and 9 film SLRs
and the Pentax D20 and Nikon D300). This makes to attachment faster
to attached or remove making which in turn allows me to
respond to changing situations a lot quicker.
For a modern camera it is
rather surprising that the increasingly common (and almost standard)
Live View feature has not been catered for. I personally did not
miss it on this camera. If live view was included it should be with
an articulating LCD monitor to get to full benefit of its use.
Whether you see the lack of live view as a serious omission will
depend on how you will intend to use the a700 but it does not make
the camera any less of a photographic tool.
The vertical grip is a
useful addition. For me it just makes life a bit easier especially
when handling larger lenses or when taking lots of shots in portrait
orientation. It has a surprising amount of controls to replicate the
cameras main controls. I found in general i can average around 600
shots per battery charge and it is fairly quick and straightforward
replacing a battery. However, when handling the camera with a large
lens and or when changing a battery is to be avoided, the ability of
the vertical grip to handle two batteries is very handy. The power
level meter on the camera adapts to indicate the two batteries and
their state of charge. It is worth noting that in general when the
power level meter indicates a battery is depleted it is still
possible to take a number of photos before the camera shuts down.

The Sony a700 makes
photography a joy. It does not have all the features and refinements
of competing DSLRs but then they lack some of the a700's features
too. At the end of the day a camera is judged by how it performs in
the field and the results achieved and the a700 is very capable.
EA
The Sony A700 has been out for a few years now
and remains the sole model not to have been replaced in the Alpha
range. That being being said it is still as capable as any of the
more recent DSLRs and its price drop makes it an even more
attractive proposition. If you are looking for an upgrade you may
want to consider either the A850 or the A900 full frame DSLRs.



Sony Alpha 350
Review
Sony Alpha 850
Sony 70-300mm G
SSM Lens
|