|
There was a time when not everyone had a
camera at their disposal. Certainly back in the 70's and 80's this
was the case. This was the era of the 126 and 110 compact cartridge
cameras. These cameras, specifically the 110 format, captured images
on very small negatives. The image quality was often derided as the
quality was at best seemed as only suitable for snapshots. There
were attempts to introduce higher quality cameras for the format but
in the end the format made way for 35mm compacts.
The initial introduction of cameras on phones was
derided by some as pointless as they used tiny image sensors and
were initially separate modules that had to be attached to the phone and offer a very
limited image resolution of only 1/3 megapixel (or VGA at best) with
only fixed focus. It did not help that LCD screens on the phones at that time were
also poor in resolution and colour rendition. However with each
generation of phone there has been significant improvements in the
technology to permit cameras to be built into the phones and the LCD
screens offering ever increasing resolution and colours more
colours than the
eye can perceive.
The mobile phone has become part of everyday
life and the fact that most phones now have cameras built in means
there is less chance on missing a photo opportunity whether at a
social event or just out for a walk.
Digital cameras have been offering increasing
megapixel count with nearly every generate. Despite the tiny image
sensors used camera phones have not been exceptions to this rule. Currently top end camera phones offer
resolutions up to 8 megapixels but this will be increase to 12
megapixel by the end of the year (2009). Unfortunately there are
severe limitations that act against the benefits of the increased
pixel count. The Imaging sensor in the typical compact digital camera is
measures around 1/2" (diagonal). By comparison the typical sensor used in a camera phone is even smaller, measuring
1/4". As the physical size of a pixel reduces its ability to
collect light also declines. The reduction in captured light
means the digital representation drops in amplitude bringing it closer to the noise floor (as dictated by component and
general system noise) making image noise more obvious. Sophisticated image
processing is the order of the day with all digital cameras but with camera phones
more effort is required to keep image noise under control. Strong
noise reduction helps but at the same time introduces artifacts which will
likely make the final image
look artificial. A compromise has to be made between image noise
levels and final image quality. The camera phone has not been designed to tackle demanding
photographic situations but for casual use.
Despite the limitations of current camera phones
their use is increasing with some people using it as their main
camera whilst on holiday. No doubt as use increases there will be
more demands for improved image quality. The low end low budget
compact digital camera may be consigned to the history books.
The features provided within camera phones are
expanding. Although you won't find full manual exposure control (or
even aperture priority for that matter) a number of controls are
increasingly being provided to give added flexibility. The features
you can typically expect are as follows:
- Exposure Compensation
- White Balance
- Metering
mode
- Flash (Xenon or LED)
- Focus Mode
- Focus aid light
- Timer Standby
- Digital zoom
- Face
Detection
- High quality LCD or AMOLED screen
The main missing feature is optical zoom but
the phone size is no doubt the constraining factor here.
Very few camera phones are fixed focus now. The implementation of autofocus varies from
camera to camera. Some show a discrete focusing point where others
may not show a focus point at all and use any part of the screen to
focus with a particular focusing bias towards the central area. The more
recent AF systems are now employing face detection to minimise the
occurrence of mis-focus when attempting to take a portrait of
someone. With the growing popularity of touch screen phones, touch
focus has been introduced as a quicker way of specifying where the
camera should focus.
Just like the digital compact cameras, the flash systems
on camera phones have a tendency to be under
powered and as a result provide only sufficient illumination for
close subjects. This may not be an issue if all you are taking is
portraits of people (mainly head and shoulder shots) but full length
shots may be a struggle for the flash system due to the extra
distance.
There are generally two types of flash systems
employed on camera phones; the Xenon flash, and the LED flash. The
Xenon flash is as close to what is employed on standard cameras. It
produced a very brief but intense flash of light. The LED flash on
the over hand produces a bright light of longer duration. Most
modern camera phones will feature dual LED flash system as a single
LED flash provides very short range illumination. Doubling up the
LEDs increases the overall brightness in an attempt to match the
xenon flash systems.
Assuming parity between the Xenon and LED
flash systems there are significant differences that affect how
best the
flash can be used. The xenon flash with it's very brief but intense
light output provides a means of freezing any subject motion. The
flash light only has a during of say 50µs. The LED flash on the other hand
cannot produce such a short duration of light (shortest duration typically in
milliseconds rather than microseconds). As a result should the
subject move it is likely the resultant image would be blurred even
though illuminated. The LED flash does have the benefit that it can
make a decent video light as it can produce a continuous light
source (where as the xenon flash cannot). Some cameras have been
known to employ both systems but the LED flash is the system mostly
used.
With the various elements that conspire to
degrade image quality the camera phone is still capable of taking
acceptable quality photos in the right conditions. As with any
camera, it is important to use the correct settings to ensure the
best quality.
All camera phones are storing their images in
the JPEG format. Image compression has an obvious effect on the
final quality of the image. If memory space is not an issue (and it
should not be if images are saved to a memory card rather than the
phones internal memory) and there is a facility to adjust the
quality level, then it should be set to its highest setting. This
represents the least amount of compression that the camera phone
will allow. The effects of data compression are unlikely to be
obvious when just viewing a captured image on the phones screen
(with the whole image displayed) but magnifying the images and the
artifacts become apparent. If prints are intended then the highest
quality setting is a must.
With no aperture or shutter speed adjustments
to be concerned about the user can just
concentrate on getting the
right composition. The camera phones responsiveness (or in many
cases the lack of) can dampens a persons enthusiasm for taking
photos. The shutter release on the typical camera phone is not
responsive. Pressing the
shutter half way to achieve a focus lock can be slow and then the
response to pressing the shutter all the way down to make the
exposure seems to impose another delay. If the subject remains still
or is not likely to be going anywhere (i.e. a landscape) then slow
autofocus and camera response may not be an issue. Sports on the
other hand become more of a challenge. By the time the camera phone
has focused and released the shutter the sports subject may be long
gone. Some phones provide a facility to set the AF to infinity. With
a camera phones typical wide depth of field the infinite setting
effectively means subjects will be sharp from about 3 metres and
beyond. With the focus fixed there is no pre-focus delay time which
makes the phone feel that bit more responsive.
Depth of field is not an issue unless the
subject is especially close to the camera. It comes into play when
taking macro photos and can add a bit of dimension to the overall
photo.

As the focusing system is using the contrast
level presented on the image sensor, if light levels are too high
focus errors may happen resulting in blurry images. Sometimes it is
useful to focus on a different part of a subject (at a similar
distance) to ensure good focus.
The exposure metering is usually linked to
where the focus is. There is very little that can be done here.
Exposure compensation if available should be applied where necessary
(either for a better exposure or as a form of special effect).
All camera phones will automatically try to
determine the correct white balance. On the whole they do a
respectable job but they can be fooled. If preset white balance
settings are available they should be used to ensure a more
consistent set of results across a set of images.
The JPEG image files are always sharpened.
Unfortunately some are over sharpened but this is to be expected for
a camera that is aimed at the general consumer. It does mean that
decent prints should be possible without any further user
intervention.
At the end of the day, the camera phone is all
about fun and having a method of recording those unexpected events
at any time. With more phones now having GPS modules built in it is
possible to geotag images so the location a photo was taken will
never be forgotten.



















|